File _service:tar_scm_kernel_repo:0042-Correctly-com... of Package edk2

File _service:tar_scm_kernel_repo:0042-Correctly-compare-EdiPartyName-in-GENERAL_NAME_cmp.patch of Package edk2

From fe9395b9fe1507236eafd147dc0cd4a8c9bf1fe6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: chenhuiying <chenhuiying4@huawei.com>
Date: Sat, 25 Feb 2023 17:54:23 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] Correctly compare EdiPartyName in GENERAL_NAME_cmp()

If a GENERAL_NAME field contained EdiPartyName data then it was
incorrectly being handled as type "other". This could lead to a
segmentation fault.

Many thanks to David Benjamin from Google for reporting this issue.

CVE-2020-1971

reference: https://github.com/openssl/openssl/commit/f960d81215ebf3f65e03d4d5d857fb9b666d6920
Signed-off-by: chenhuiying <chenhuiying4@huawei.com>
---
 .../openssl/crypto/x509v3/v3_genn.c           | 45 +++++++++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 42 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/CryptoPkg/Library/OpensslLib/openssl/crypto/x509v3/v3_genn.c b/CryptoPkg/Library/OpensslLib/openssl/crypto/x509v3/v3_genn.c
index 23e3bc4..23778e2 100644
--- a/CryptoPkg/Library/OpensslLib/openssl/crypto/x509v3/v3_genn.c
+++ b/CryptoPkg/Library/OpensslLib/openssl/crypto/x509v3/v3_genn.c
@@ -57,6 +57,37 @@ GENERAL_NAME *GENERAL_NAME_dup(GENERAL_NAME *a)
                                     (char *)a);
 }
 
+static int edipartyname_cmp(const EDIPARTYNAME *a, const EDIPARTYNAME *b)
+{
+    int res;
+
+    if (a == NULL || b == NULL) {
+        /*
+         * Shouldn't be possible in a valid GENERAL_NAME, but we handle it
+         * anyway. OTHERNAME_cmp treats NULL != NULL so we do the same here
+         */
+        return -1;
+    }
+    if (a->nameAssigner == NULL && b->nameAssigner != NULL)
+        return -1;
+    if (a->nameAssigner != NULL && b->nameAssigner == NULL)
+        return 1;
+    /* If we get here then both have nameAssigner set, or both unset */
+    if (a->nameAssigner != NULL) {
+        res = ASN1_STRING_cmp(a->nameAssigner, b->nameAssigner);
+        if (res != 0)
+            return res;
+    }
+    /*
+     * partyName is required, so these should never be NULL. We treat it in
+     * the same way as the a == NULL || b == NULL case above
+     */
+    if (a->partyName == NULL || b->partyName == NULL)
+        return -1;
+
+    return ASN1_STRING_cmp(a->partyName, b->partyName);
+}
+
 /* Returns 0 if they are equal, != 0 otherwise. */
 int GENERAL_NAME_cmp(GENERAL_NAME *a, GENERAL_NAME *b)
 {
@@ -66,8 +97,11 @@ int GENERAL_NAME_cmp(GENERAL_NAME *a, GENERAL_NAME *b)
         return -1;
     switch (a->type) {
     case GEN_X400:
+        result = ASN1_TYPE_cmp(a->d.x400Address, b->d.x400Address);
+        break;
+
     case GEN_EDIPARTY:
-        result = ASN1_TYPE_cmp(a->d.other, b->d.other);
+        result = edipartyname_cmp(a->d.ediPartyName, b->d.ediPartyName);
         break;
 
     case GEN_OTHERNAME:
@@ -114,8 +148,11 @@ void GENERAL_NAME_set0_value(GENERAL_NAME *a, int type, void *value)
 {
     switch (type) {
     case GEN_X400:
+        a->d.x400Address = value;
+        break;
+
     case GEN_EDIPARTY:
-        a->d.other = value;
+        a->d.ediPartyName = value;
         break;
 
     case GEN_OTHERNAME:
@@ -149,8 +186,10 @@ void *GENERAL_NAME_get0_value(const GENERAL_NAME *a, int *ptype)
         *ptype = a->type;
     switch (a->type) {
     case GEN_X400:
+        return a->d.x400Address;
+
     case GEN_EDIPARTY:
-        return a->d.other;
+        return a->d.ediPartyName;
 
     case GEN_OTHERNAME:
         return a->d.otherName;
-- 
2.27.0