File _service:tar_scm_kernel_repo:backport-0008-CVE-... of Package samba

File _service:tar_scm_kernel_repo:backport-0008-CVE-2020-25722-Check-all-elements-in-acl_check_spn-n.patch of Package samba

From f1c64ed29ea0911beaa1cd3b80915ef5b44085af Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Date: Mon, 1 Nov 2021 17:19:29 +1300
Subject: [PATCH 137/266] CVE-2020-25722 Check all elements in acl_check_spn()
 not just the first one

Thankfully we are aleady in a loop over all the message elements in
acl_modify() so this is an easy and safe change to make.

BUG: https://bugzilla.samba.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14876
Signed-off-by: Andrew Bartlett <abartlet@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: Joseph Sutton <josephsutton@catalyst.net.nz>

Conflict:remove test
Reference:https://gitlab.com/samba-team/samba/-/commit/f1c64ed29ea0911beaa1cd3b80915ef5b44085af

---
 source4/dsdb/samdb/ldb_modules/acl.c | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++-------
 1 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
 delete mode 100644 selftest/knownfail.d/acl-spn

diff --git a/source4/dsdb/samdb/ldb_modules/acl.c b/source4/dsdb/samdb/ldb_modules/acl.c
index 9cae15881de..d0b3da4d9e8 100644
--- a/source4/dsdb/samdb/ldb_modules/acl.c
+++ b/source4/dsdb/samdb/ldb_modules/acl.c
@@ -653,9 +653,14 @@ success:
 	return LDB_SUCCESS;
 }
 
+/*
+ * Passing in 'el' is critical, we want to check all the values.
+ *
+ */
 static int acl_check_spn(TALLOC_CTX *mem_ctx,
 			 struct ldb_module *module,
 			 struct ldb_request *req,
+			 const struct ldb_message_element *el,
 			 struct security_descriptor *sd,
 			 struct dom_sid *sid,
 			 const struct dsdb_attribute *attr,
@@ -667,7 +672,6 @@ static int acl_check_spn(TALLOC_CTX *mem_ctx,
 	struct ldb_context *ldb = ldb_module_get_ctx(module);
 	struct ldb_result *acl_res;
 	struct ldb_result *netbios_res;
-	struct ldb_message_element *el;
 	struct ldb_dn *partitions_dn = samdb_partitions_dn(ldb, tmp_ctx);
 	uint32_t userAccountControl;
 	const char *samAccountName;
@@ -717,6 +721,23 @@ static int acl_check_spn(TALLOC_CTX *mem_ctx,
 		return ret;
 	}
 
+	/*
+	 * If we have "validated write spn", allow delete of any
+	 * existing value (this keeps constrained delete to the same
+	 * rules as unconstrained)
+	 */
+	if (req->operation == LDB_MODIFY) {
+		/*
+		 * If not add or replace (eg delete),
+		 * return success
+		 */
+		if ((el->flags
+		     & (LDB_FLAG_MOD_ADD|LDB_FLAG_MOD_REPLACE)) == 0) {
+			talloc_free(tmp_ctx);
+			return LDB_SUCCESS;
+		}
+	}
+
 	ret = dsdb_module_search_dn(module, tmp_ctx,
 				    &acl_res, req->op.mod.message->dn,
 				    acl_attrs,
@@ -745,13 +766,6 @@ static int acl_check_spn(TALLOC_CTX *mem_ctx,
 
 	netbios_name = ldb_msg_find_attr_as_string(netbios_res->msgs[0], "nETBIOSName", NULL);
 
-	el = ldb_msg_find_element(req->op.mod.message, "servicePrincipalName");
-	if (!el) {
-		talloc_free(tmp_ctx);
-		return ldb_error(ldb, LDB_ERR_OPERATIONS_ERROR,
-					 "Error finding element for servicePrincipalName.");
-	}
-
 	/* NTDSDSA objectGuid of object we are checking SPN for */
 	if (userAccountControl & (UF_SERVER_TRUST_ACCOUNT | UF_PARTIAL_SECRETS_ACCOUNT)) {
 		ret = dsdb_module_find_ntdsguid_for_computer(module, tmp_ctx,
@@ -1510,6 +1524,7 @@ static int acl_modify(struct ldb_module *module, struct ldb_request *req)
 			ret = acl_check_spn(tmp_ctx,
 					    module,
 					    req,
+					    el,
 					    sd,
 					    sid,
 					    attr,
-- 
2.23.0